Scene Coverage: You Can’t Film It All

We covered what scene coverage means in film, in the preceding article Build Your Shot List Like A Pro. Covering a scene is often done with many angles of the same action to get enough shots for the editor, but an entire scene on every angle can burn up time and burn out actors.

Contributed by Glen Berry
Edited by Stavros C. Stavrides


We cannot shoot everything
The Director must have a refined vision
Provide the editor with coverage

What is Coverage and Shooting Ratio

As we see the scene playing out in our heads, we get a read for the emotional material of the scene ahead of time. We start identifying the shots we’ll need to make the scene work. We note the shot types noted on a list – Close Up, Medium Shot, Two-shot, etc.

Coverage is filming enough material from different angles of the same action to provide the editor with sufficient redundant material to flexibly cut the scene together. 

We know that enough coverage allows the editor to adjust the rhythm of a scene, even its meaning, purely through the flexibility of shots. If you only shoot one angle, the editor has no choice but to use that angle.

Ideally, we also have to think of how these angles may cut together in the edit. When the scene is edited, its length is a fraction of the total amount of footage we filmed. This brings up the Shooting Ratio.

The shooting ratio is the difference between how much footage we shoot versus how much is used in the final film. For example, if we film 200 minutes of video for a 100-minute edited piece, this is a 2-to-1 ratio (2:1). If we shoot 2000 minutes of raw footage for the 100-minute final edit, we shoot at a 20:1 ratio.

The Cost of Too Much Coverage

While some directors want to shoot the whole scene from every angle to have more choice in editing. Producers are concerned about the shooting ratio.

In the old days, it was because film was expensive to buy and too costly to process at the lab. so we had to plan well for a reasonable shooting ratio – maybe 12:1 for the average budget. This was the limit. 

Today, digital media is way cheaper than film, and there are no lab costs. So let’s fire away, right? Not so fast. Math can still kill us. 


This is a support article linked from the “Scene Coverage” chapter in Cyber Film School’s Multi-Touch Filmmaking Textbook


While digital media itself is cheaper, time at the backend is not cheap. Think of data management time. Costs of ingesting and drive storage; the labour involved in screening for logging and transcriptions; and the editor’s time for screening and annotating everything. In the end, a high shooting ratio still costs. So ratio costs. Ask a producer. 

Sure, when you’re making an eight-minute short with maybe seven or eight scenes, and just a few angles on each scene, fire away. Shoot the full performance with every angle – if your actors can take it. But on longer works like a feature, we have to learn to be more selective. Not only do we plan our shots, but we plan our cuts. 

Sure, we still want to give our editor flexibility by providing options, but with some planning, there is a method to being selective enough to respect the shooting ratio while getting enough coverage. 

Remember these four rules:

  • You Cannot Shoot Everything
  • The Director’s Vision is in Charge
  • Balance Coverage and Resources
  • Plan The Cuts

You Can’t Shoot Everything

For practical reasons, especially for long scenes, we sometimes cannot shoot the entire length of the same action from every angle. 

There may not be enough time in the day for it. You wear out your crew and your actors. Performances will not stay fresh after four takes on the eighth angle. There is no need to do all of it. It can be a waste of time. 

A seasoned director identifies what parts of each angle of the scene are really necessary, and shoots that – with a bit of overlap at each end of the action. 

Be clear on where that shot starts and where it ends, what angle will run into it in the edit, and what shot runs out of it. To do this, you must have a good idea of every shot transition in advance. 

Of course, there may be occasional uncertainty on a certain angle from time to time, and the director wishes to cover the entire length for safety from that angle, but this should be more the exception for a confident director and not a habit

The director must have a general plan pre-production and follow through on that plan in production, while still leaving a bit of room for the editor to improvise. 

The Director’s Vision is in Charge 

The director puts together a plan for every shot and transition and creates that material in production. The editor then reads the material and puts it together the way that the director intended

An editor should be able to look at the footage and read the director’s intent, able to see the plan that the director created just by viewing the footage.

Thelma Schoonmaker has won three Academy Awards for Editing – for “Raging Bull”, “The Aviator”, and “The Departed”. Although enormously talented, she is also very self-effacing. She once said that she did not deserve an award for “Raging Bull”, she simply put it together “the way that Marty shot it”, referring to the director, Martin Scorsese.

So how do we as directors, plan the cuts in our heads, and shoot for that plan, while still giving our editors some flexibility to transition between shots? The first step is to find the moments in the scene where you will need each shot and when we will not need each shot. 

Balance Coverage and Resources

We need to make decisions as directors. We have a read on the emotional material of the scene, we should be able to select moments in the scene where we will need certain shots and other moments where we will not. 

As you will recall from the “Fistful of Dollars” example, the scene’s classic construction moves between wide shots and closer as it builds to the climax. 

Suppose, for example, a director’s vision may not call for a wide shot at the climax of the scene. Instead, the director wants to be tight on the actors at the climax to see the expressions on their faces. The wide shot may be useless for that, so in the director’s opinion, there is no point in shooting that portion of the action wide. 

In doing this we create intentional ‘gaps’ in our coverage, where parts of the action have not been covered from certain angles. But these gaps should be planned out in advance, while still allowing enough overlap for key bits of the action. 

Conclusion

We want sufficient coverage to cut the scene together, cover the action, and provide options to the editor without shooting the entire scene from all angles. We seek a balance between flexibility and the resources (energy and time) we expend on coverage. 

Many moments can be exploited by the editor to make a seamless transition but the savvy director would be wise to know where they are in advance and incorporate that into his or her plan for when to start and end a shot. 

Knowing where these transitions (or cuts) take place requires at least a little knowledge of editing and some practice. 

In the meantime, on your short films with fewer angles and brief scenes, go ahead and shoot everything on every angle; over time, with enough practice in shooting and cutting these films, you exercise the ability to plan your cuts, better preparing you to engage in longer and more complex projects. 

SUMMARY

The director cannot shoot all angles in their entirety. It can wear out the cast and crew, waste time and kill morale. The director must have a vision.

The director must know all angles and perspectives and make decisions about what parts of the scene to cover from which angles.

Give the editor options by covering the action in the scene from more than one angle.

NEXT >>>
PLAN YOUR SHOT TRANSITIONS
to allow for smooth edits

<<< PREVIOUS
BUILD YOUR SHOT LIST

An Analysis
of Scene Coverage
from Sergio Leone’s “A Fistful of Dollars”


Make Cinema Your Language

Cinema is a language we all understand, but not everyone ‘speaks’ it–directors do.

This interactive, self-guided textbook is a director’s toolbox, made for Apple Books.

Embrace a solid foundation with a future-proof, classic combo of theory, technique, history, and critical thinking. 

Gain practical, adaptable creative skills and insight that transcend technological changes, be it a camera, mobile device, or AI.

 Visit the Book Page Now

“Don’t Do a Short Film!”

The long and the ‘short’ of it with Two-Day Film School guru Dov Simens

We had the pleasure of interviewing filmmaking Two-Day Film School guru Dov Simens some years ago for Cyber Film School. What a gas! He’s bigger than life, a straight shooter, and what you see is what-you-get with this guy.

by Stavros C. Stavrides


Dov breaks down the filmmaking process, from script to production as a system based on a formula.  

For example, “Don’t let anyone tell you screenwriting is not a formula,” he says. “Screenwriting is a formula. We took it off of Shakespeare. Shakespeare took it from Marlowe. Marlowe took it from Plato. Plato took it from Aristotle. And I guarantee you Aristotle took it from a caveman!” He’s proud to teach.

Love him or hate him,  he’s had some interesting names walk through his doors before they became household names (well, at least in a filmmakers household – for the filmmakers who have houses) – Quentin Tarantino, Chris Nolan, Spike Lee, Kevin Smith, Queen Latifah, Guy Ritchie, among others.

He spells out his formula of feature filmmaking as he sees it. He advises that if you’re going through the trouble of hiring gear, actors, or a location, may as well do a feature – not a short film. Here we have his seven-minute-eleven-second hell-raising tirade that is his formula.  If you dig his drill sergeant manners in these few minutes,  imagine a two-day power weekend with Dov Simens!

We shot this interview some time ago – so his references to distribution revolve mostly around theatrical markets. Otherwise, Dov’s advice is timeless.

We had so much fun hanging out with this guy. Please leave comments below so we can kick around his ideas, for better or worse. Do you agree with his approach? Is filmmaking a formula? 

“Stop being scared of the word feature!”

 You can visit Dov and explore his program at webfilmschool.com  
*This link is provided for informational purposes and as a courtesy. Publisher of this post does not receive compensation, nor is it an endorsement. 

Ahead

  • Rhythm & Pacing
  • The Screenwriting Formula
  • Getting a Name Actor
  • Theatrical Distribution
  • The Production Formula

TRANSCRIPT:

It’s so dumb! I’m going to be the only teacher in the world that’s ever going to say, “Don’t do a short. Don’t do a short!” Does anybody buy shorts, that writes checks? NO! So your first business decision in the film industry is to make something that you are guaranteed not to be able to sell. Stupid!

Now let’s stop being scared of the word “feature,” but let’s do a feature that you can handle, which is a dressed up stage play, a courtroom drama, a one-room location. I jokingly in my class say, for the first feature film, “Here’s your formula. Take twelve kids to a house and chop them up. That you can handle. You know, it’s possible that will get out there. And there’s not one of you out there listening right now to this that can’t get a camera, can’t get some film or tape, can’t get twelve actors that are called waiters, put them in a room and tell them to talk for 90 minutes. Hit the “ON” Button.

Learn Rhythm and Pacing

“It takes about four or five scripts.”

The sole single biggest problem of first-time filmmakers had never become a second time filmmaker is they fall in love with the first typing that comes in front of their face, especially if they typed it themselves. They all believe they’re instantly Michael Jordan the first day they pick up a basketball. And in the film industry, in the writing industry, we believe even if you’re gifted about writing, you don’t really learn how to write the great script until your fourth or fifth script.

You got to learn the rhythm, learn the pacing. You can learn the formulas from the books. You can learn how to type from the books. But somehow the rhythm you can’t learn. It just happens. You got to play a little basketball for a while. You got to rehearse, and it takes about four or five scripts.


Make Cinema Your Language

Cinema is a language we all understand, but not everyone ‘speaks’ it–directors do.

This interactive, self-guided textbook is a director’s toolbox, made for Apple Books.

Embrace a solid foundation with a future-proof, classic combo of theory, technique, history, and critical thinking. 

Gain practical, adaptable creative skills and insight that transcend technological changes, be it a camera, mobile device, or AI.

 Visit the Book Page Now


The Screenwriting Formula

“I’m the blatant film instructor that cuts right to the chase.”

And the screenwriting instructors that are out there – Bob McKee, Syd Field, John Truby, Michael Hauge, Linda Seger, Viky King, Madeleine DiMaggio, they’re all very good. They give intensive one-day, two-day, three-day classes, etc. And they all talk around the Hollywood formula. They’re all paranoid about saying it’s a ‘formula’, screenwriting. They all swear it’s not a formula ‘cause god bless, some critic might criticize them for teaching formulaic screenwriting. And they all then teach a formula and they swear it’s not a formula, and they’ve all created little pseudonyms for what this is –‘paradigm,’ ‘inciting moments’, ‘plot points,’ whatever.

Well, I’m the blatant film instructor that cuts right to the chase. I’m gonna tell you right up front: screenwriting is a formula. We took it off of Shakespeare. Shakespeare took it from Marlowe. Marlowe took it from Plato. Plato took it from Aristotle. And I guarantee you Aristotle took it from a caveman.

Now you want the formula? I’ll give it to you. I’m proud to teach! I’m proud to be the great teacher, and here’s the formula:

Every screenplay that’s great has 5 “uh-oh’s”, “Oh shits!” and one “Oh my god!” in it – 5 “uh-oh’s”, “Oh shits!” and one “Oh my god!” in it.

There are 40 scenes in a movie maybe there are 50. You got your rollercoaster ride that’s built in there:

  • Introduce the boy
  • Introduce girl
  • Introduce the situation
  • Introduce the desire
  • Introduced they want to take an action
  • Introduce they take an action

Everything seems to be good and now, UH-OH!” We’re only about 8 to 10 minutes into the movie. Pull the carpet out from underneath them

Two scenes later give them a further complication called an, “Oh shit!” But we’re only about 12 to 15 minutes in the movie.

“Uh-oh! Oh shit…Uh-oh! Oh shit…Uh-oh! Oh shit…”

And then, “Oh my god! No way will they ever get through it!”

Two scenes later it gets resolved.

 Getting a Name Actor

It’s very important to have a name attached to your project. You’ve heard that ten thousand times. It’s very important to get a name attached to your project. But to get the name attached to your project you don’t have the check to pay it on your first project, so it’s ridiculous stuff. But when you get to your third feature film…If your first feature is a no-budget feature film that gets out there gets to the proper festival, gets picked up by a distributor, they will do creative bookkeeping, but they’ll make you famous and you probably won’t make a penny from it.

But then on your second film, now you’re gonna get a salary upfront a higher budget and you get a little bit of money in your pocket, you make your second film. And if your second film gets out there and makes money, now enough of the names! (If) the industry found out that “that guy or that woman is good, I want my name attached to their project because they’re going to take me to another level and they’ve proven they can make money,” then they’ll come to you.

Theatrical Distribution

“The best thing about you is when you’re done you’re broke!”

Distribution. If you can’t distribute you got to distribute and you’re not gonna distribute. Stop this dribble with this self-distribution crap. (If) you take your film, make a bunch of prints, put them in Edmonton, put in Calgary, put them in Toronto, put them In Denver, put them in Miami in a small theater, you’re gonna be in small claims court in every state in every city In North America trying to collect from theater owners that are close to broke. And if they ever do pay, you take six months before they ever pay you, so yes you need a distributor. You need a distributor.

You’re not going to get the major distributors – Warner Brothers, Paramount, 20th Century, Universal, but each one of the major distributors has a mini-major arm that’s smaller than a Miramax or New Line which is good also. A Strand Releasing, a Fox Searchlight, an Orion Classics, Sony classics. Now where are you gonna get this distributor? You know what? You’re gonna go to film festivals. You take your film and go to a festival. Every city in the world has cultural events, opera, ballet, symphony, the last thing is a Film Festival. So they need your film. But understand the film festival will charge you entrance fees, submission fee, projectionists, and booking the theater.

Why do you go to a festival? Every distributor in North America is making their own films themselves, but they know there are people out there like you, quote “independent filmmakers” that are dumb enough and stupid enough and naive enough to spend your own money. So obviously distributors are looking for you. You’re free! Do you know why distributors love you? You’re free. You’re cheap. You have no overhead, no guild or union affiliations, no development cost, and the best thing about you is when you’re done you’re broke!

The Production Formula

Get the script. How much money do you have? How many weeks can you afford to shoot? You can afford one week of shoot, that’s actually nine shooting days. Monday you rent the camera and the equipment over two weekends. You got a 90-page script, you got ten shooting days. That’s your shooting schedule.

(If) you got enough money for two weeks to feed a crew and pay your crew and rent the equipment for two weeks, you got 13 shooting days. Divide 13 into 90 pages, that’s a script – that’s 7 shooting (pages per) day. You got enough money for three weeks? That’s 18 shooting days divide that into a 90-page script, 5 shooting pages per day.

Five pages per day, you got approximately 12 hours of shooting daylight in the day, let’s take two hours for eating and getting ready. 10 hours of shooting, so five pages – one page every two hours. And in those two hours, I want a master shot, two medium shots, a reaction shot, a point-of-view shot, a cutaway shot, and a cat-in-the-window shot. So you got 18 to 20 minutes for each shot. On each shot, I want key lighting, backlighting, fill lighting, and possibly an eye light. And I don’t want the camera just on a tripod. I want it with some dollying and some little bit of camera movement, and “let’s go!”

MORE ARTICLES 

Make Cinema Your Language

Cinema is a language we all understand, but not everyone ‘speaks’ it–directors do.

This interactive, self-guided textbook is a director’s toolbox, made for Apple Books.

Embrace a solid foundation with a future-proof, classic combo of theory, technique, history, and critical thinking. 

Gain practical, adaptable creative skills and insight that transcend technological changes, be it a camera, mobile device, or AI.

 Visit the Book Page Now

     

Build Your Film Shot List Like A Pro


When reading a script or recalling a film, we often idealize its vision– the picture is flawless in the perfect world of our mind’s eye. But as directors planning our own films, it’s an entirely different exercise.


by Glen Berry, edited by Stavros Stavrides


What Is A Shot List?

If you don’t know where to begin building your shot list, you need to get a read on the emotional content of your material.

The director studies the script and imagines how the scene will play visually. The process is called ‘breaking down the script.’  A director lists the types of shots that will ‘cover’ the scene. The list of shots is called a Shot Breakdown. 

The Shot Breakdown is then communicated to the creative team as a Shot List, storyboard, or both.

Shot list example shows sequence of shots on a spread sheet

What a shot list does need to contain, at minimum, is a list of shots where each shows a description of the action and shot size – Long Shot, Medium Shot, Close Up, etc. 

The shot number and its corresponding scene number help organize the shooting schedule. The list may then be organized into an order of filming on the schedule.

Building Your Shot List

When reading a script or recalling a film, we often idealize its vision and in the perfect world of our minds, the picture is flawless. But as directors planning our own films, it’s an entirely different exercise.

As visual people reading a script on the first pass, we may see the movie play out in our heads. The visual treatment plays as we go from line to line. However, as readers, we’re mostly feeling the effect as we read, not so much focused on the precise order of shots and how they specifically flow together.

Similarly, when we think back to our favorite movie, we can recall specific shots, effects, and sequences, but not every shot from every scene, the order of shots, how long each stayed onscreen, and how each transitioned into another.

If we were focusing on all that as an audience, and not hooked on the story, that film is in trouble!

When reading a script or recalling a film, we often idealize its vision and in the perfect world of our minds, the picture is flawless. But as directors planning our own films, it’s an entirely different exercise.

Once we’re past story structure and script, we need a well-developed idea of how the visual elements unfold in our movie. Creating a shot list, shot by shot, scene by scene, sequence by sequence, we make a plan. 

It needn’t be perfect at first, but a strong vision of the outcome will guide us as we select various shot types, moving from master shots to close-ups, with purpose.

So once again, we face a blank page as we prepare to begin our shot list. How to begin? Let’s start with a scene.

REMEMBER: We are presenting a conventional approach to scene construction. As professional directors, we determine the key moments and plan accordingly, rather than select shots in a cookie-cutter template. However, if you don’t know where to begin, it’s a way to get started and depart from there.


This post is a support article for the “Shot Vocabulary” chapter in Cyber Film School’s 
Multi-Touch Filmmaking Textbook


Breaking It Down

Story board is a visual version of the shot list.

Many of us are aware that an entire film has a dramatic curve – beginning, middle, and end. We may have even identified the movie’s plot structure with ‘high points’ like:

  1. Exposition
  2. Inciting Moments
  3. Rising Action
  4. Conflict
  5. Climax, and
  6. Resolution

We’ll examine these High Points further below.

Where an entire picture’s structure may be analyzed with these high points, so can almost every scene of our script. Each scene may be structured in the same way, with its resolution at the end of each scene driving us to the next scene.

Think of a scene as a kind of visual paragraph. In literature, where a paragraph on the page is made up of sentences and words, a sequence of shots in a film makes up a scene.

Our task right now is to select the size and angle of each shot and sequence them to construct a scene.

Shot Size & Angle

Long Shot, Medium Shot, Close Up, Over-the-shoulder Close Up

In general terms, the Wide Shot (or Long Shot) is often expository, offering us factual information about the scene’s setting, and/or establishing the relationship between objects and the changes between them. In short, it’s the scene’s ‘setup’.

The close-up tends to be concise or expressive, calling attention to more specific detail meant to convey a specific emotional impact.



Wide Shot exposes enormous amounts of information. It is commonly used as a tool for conveying large amounts of information to the audience – geography of the space, time period, setting, mood, activity, characters in the space, and all action taking place.

Compared to the Long Shot, the Close-Up is hyper-focused. It conveys context, emotion, or grandiose effect. Trained on a person’s face, it delivers emotional detail so the audience gets to feel the impact on the character and more closely identify with their circumstance.

Extreme close-ups are often used at the climax of the scene to heighten the intensity of the moment for the audience.

As the action rises toward the climax of the scene, a common technique is to ‘tighten’ the shots incrementally from the wide shot to a close-up.

A Wide Shot exposes enormous amounts of information. It is commonly used as a tool for conveying large amounts of information to the audience – geography of the space, time period, setting, mood, activity, characters in the space, and all action taking place.

A movie’s entire story is commonly structured with rising action to a climax, then a resolution. A single scene is often written in the same way, then visually treated by its director with shot sizes to rise and fall in intensity, through shot selection.

If we were to stack up shots in the order of wide shot, full shot, medium shot, and close up, we would have the effect of ramping up the scene’s intensity as it progresses up the ladder of rising action of the dramatic curve.

Here is an example of how the shots stack up in a sequence of rising action in a confrontation scene from the classic “A Fist Full of Dollars”, directed by Sergio Leone and starring Clint Eastwood as our protagonist.

1. Long Shot

2. Medium Shot

Shot list Medium Close up

Compared to the Long Shot, the Close-Up is hyper-focused. It conveys context, emotion, or grandiose effect. Trained on a person’s face, it delivers emotional detail so the audience gets to feel the impact on the character and more closely identify with their circumstance.

3. Medium Shot

Cant Eastwood Medium Shot Fistful of Dollars

 4. Close Up

Fistful of Dollars showdown shot construction

5. Close Up

Extreme CU Clint Eastwood Fistful of Dollars

Full Scene Study

Now let’s study the actual scene.  This scene appears in Act I of the movie and has preceding scenes and following scenes. The scene contains:

  1. Exposition
  2. Inciting Moments
  3. Rising Action
  4. Conflict
  5. Climax, and
  6. Resolution

As discussed earlier, we can find these elements in the dramatic curve of an entire movie, but also find them contained within one scene. First, we’ll identify these high points, then examine the scene’s shot construction.

Read the subtitles for cues. Then study the extended time-coded notes below the video.

The ‘High Points

At 0:00 – The Exposition in this clip begins with our protagonist talking to himself. This sets the stage for our conflict. He’s a killer looking for a job. “I don’t work cheap,” he says and is ready to show off his skills to a potential employer.

0:27 – We see this potential employer taking a watchful position on a balcony.

0:30 to 1:15 – The Inciting Moment begins as our protagonist walks a path of danger. He starts with, “Get three coffins ready” as he passes an undertaker and heads toward his targets, who notice him approaching.

1:15 – The Rising Action kicks off as he confronts the men. His conversation draws them deeper into a course of conflict with moments of escalation along that path.

1:55 – The Peak Moment when he throws back his cloak to reveal his gun. His intent to draw is the point of no return, as recognized by one of the antagonists in the foreground.

2:32 – The Climax of the scene, where the protagonist draws his pistol and kills the four men, the conflict is now resolved.

2:25 – With Resolution, the climax unravels. Note the shots now ‘relaxing with wider framing.  The Sheriff appears to arrest our protagonist who refuses to acknowledge the Sheriff’s authority and walks away.

In our ‘Denouement‘*, what do we know about the protagonist? He is a killer willing to provoke conflict, killing four men, then walking away in the face of authority.

* the final part of a play, movie, or narrative in which the strands of the plot are drawn together and matters are explained or resolved.

If we were to watch this scene on its own, unaware that it is part of a larger film, we could easily assume that the protagonist is really the antagonist, since he is the one provoking the fight and doing the killing. However, as the hero seeks an apology from the men about insulting his horse in a previous scene, we get the hint that the men are mean-spirited killers who deserve some get-back.

Because this scene is part of a longer film, information, and events from previous scenes play into the conflict contained in this scene. Thus, the resolution to this scene is incomplete – not the end of the story. Rather, it sets the stage for the further conflict to come in later scenes.


This post is a support article for Cyber Film School’s Multi-Touch Filmmaking Textbook.


The Shots

From 0:00 to 0:30. We open with a Medium Shot (MS) for the exposition of our character and then transition into a long, wide shot. That is our establishing shot that puts the geography of the space into context. These are expository shots.

We then move into some tighter shots, some MS, and Over-the-shoulder two-shots. We then come back out to another wide shot at 0:52 to establish the geography of the corral at the other end of the street,  but we’re still not as wide as the opening establishing shot.  We have the same, wider shot on the reverse angle at 1:15.

From 1:16 to 2:32, our conflict, we see no more wide shots.  We progressively move in tighter and tighter from MS and Two-Shotss to Close-ups. This is no coincidence as we move forward and up the slope of intensity on our dramatic curve, to increasingly tighter shots.

When our protagonist throws back his serape and both sides are committed to conflict, we see nothing but CUs from here to the climax (1:55 to 2:32). The moment of highest intensity is covered in CUs and ECUs.

Immediately after the climax of the scene, we back out of the tight shots for the denouement (2:46). We drop back off of the dramatic curve in terms of intensity and back out to wider shots, although it is an incremental step back from the height of the climax.

We stress once again:  this is a classic scene construction, where wide shots are used for exposition and close-ups for the rhetorical. Wide shots are used in the beginning with progressively tighter shots going up the dramatic curve. The tightest shots, close-ups, are used at the climax and we back off to wider shots for the denouement

If you don’t know where to begin building your film’s shot list, you need to get a read on the emotional content of your material:

Where are the moments of greatest intensity?

What is expository (wide) and what is rhetorical (close)?

Where are the turning points of your scene?

Upon what does the conflict hinge and what actions reveal the nature of the characters in the scene?

If you can identify these moments, you will have an idea of how to use framing in a series of tighter or wider shots to heighten intensity and focus the audience’s attention on the moments in your story.

As the action rises toward the climax of the scene, a common technique is to ‘tighten’ the shots incrementally from the wide shot to a close-up.

NEXT: Scene Coverage: You Can’t Film It All >>


Preview our MultiTouch Filmmaking Textbook

Extreme close-ups are often used at the climax of the scene to heighten the intensity of the moment for the audience.

Here is an example of how the shots stack up in a sequence of rising action in a confrontation scene from the classic “A Fist Full of Dollars”, directed by Sergio Leone and starring Clint Eastwood as our protagonist.

If we were to stack up shots in the order of wide shot, full shot, medium shot, and close up, we would have the effect of ramping up the scene’s intensity as it progresses up the ladder of rising action of the dramatic curvA Wide Shot exposes enormous amounts of information. It is commonly used as a tool for conveying large amounts of information to the audience – geography of the space, time period, setting, mood, activity, characters in the space, and all action taking place.

or
Get More Info